Different markets, the same method underneath. Every number here comes from real accounts. No estimates, no vanity metrics.
Real engagements across e-commerce, home trades, regulated health, and B2B SaaS. Different markets, the same method underneath.
keywords now ranking in Google's top 3 (out of 5,627 tracked)
A leather care retailer. Instead of chasing vanity search terms, we built authority around their actual products, and those product searches became the fastest-growing traffic on the site.
more revenue from search, month over month
A plumbing contractor. We targeted how customers really research, with searches like “best water heater brand”, instead of only “plumber near me”. That comparison content is what drove the growth.
for a 135,000-a-month search term
A large medical site. We audited nearly 3,900 pages and cleared out 20,000 low-value ones, and the pages that matter held their #1 spot the whole way through.
Real GSC datasearch impressions, up from near-zero in 16 months
Built the entity and topical foundation from scratch. Over 16 months the site climbed from almost no visibility to 18.6K clicks and 434K impressions at an average position of 7.4, with revenue coming in inside six months.
Real GSC datasearch impressions in 16 months
A product-led SaaS site taken from launch to 1.05M impressions and 29.5K clicks in 16 months, holding an average position of 7.1 and generating revenue within six months of launch.
Clients are shown by industry and market only. Every number here comes straight from Google Search Console, Ahrefs or Google Analytics. Real accounts, no estimates.
Each search term is a position you hold. Watch a year play out: yours climb the board while the competitor sitting on top slowly bleeds out.
Illustrative: a typical B2B SaaS keyword set over its opening year. Clicks are estimated from search volume and the usual share each position gets. Drag the timeline to scrub.
Same business, same budget. The difference is whether the pages were planned around what your buyers search, or published and hoped for.
Drag the handle · illustrative of the growth pattern, not one client's data
The real test of a method isn't my own results. It's whether other practitioners can pick it up and win with it. These are public credits from their own posts.
“This is one of those SEO posts that looks simple at first, and then makes you rethink how you actually work. A task being marked “done” doesn't necessarily mean the change reached production, or that it produced the intended result. A very practical breakdown of what SEO workflows look like when they leave the neat six-box diagram and meet reality.”
“An SEO recommendation is not really complete just because it exists in an audit or spreadsheet. There needs to be a chain from finding to plan to implementation to live result to verification. Frameworks like this are helping me think more systematically about how individual SEO activities connect to the larger system.”
In his breakdown of three Google patents, he credited Anup with introducing him to semantic SEO, Google patents, and how search works beneath the results, and called him a patient teacher.
Credited Anup's thinking on topical authority and local SEO for how he builds sites search engines trust. For a Reddit strategy that hit 400,000+ views and grew leads from 4 to 30+ a month, he named Anup as the reason Reddit was on his radar. (That case study and result are Yugesh's own.)
From local trades to global software companies, every plan is tuned to how that specific market actually searches.
Every one of these started the same way: a site that wasn't showing up for the searches that mattered. If that sounds like yours, send it over and I'll tell you what I'd fix before anything else.
Tell me about your site and what you want to grow. I'll take a look and reply personally, usually within one business day.